[ubuntu-studio-devel] What should be included by default in Trusty?

[Mike Holstein]

/me +1 kdenlive ... anyone else using anything that is relevant for video
production?

relevant = legally viable, currently in the repos,



On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:18 PM, <lukefromdc at hushmail.com> wrote:

> Kdenlive assuming no issue comes along to prevent it from building. It may
> not
> get new development for a while as the developer had to take a break and
> next
> up is a huge refactoring program, but at version 0.9.6 right now it
> performs
> very well and is regarded by many as simply the best video editor
> available in
> Linux. It is so important to my work that I could never use any version of
> any
> distro in which it could not either be installed or run from a portable
> folder.
>
> Lightworks by comparison is NOT free software, it requires activation, the
> unpaid
> version is almost useless and no source code is available. In my opinion
> no distro
> should touch it.
>
> On 02/12/2014 at 9:28 AM, "Kaj Ailomaa" <zequence at mousike.me> wrote:
> >
> >Opinions on what we should or should not include for Ubuntu Studio
> >Trusty, and why?
> >
> >plugins, applications, tools, fonts, etc, etc...
> >
> >--
> >ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
> >ubuntu-studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> >Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> >https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-studio-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
>



-- 
MH

mikeholstein.info <http://www.mikeholstein.info/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/attachments/20140212/26acb2ad/attachment-0001.html>