LMMS?

[Len Ovens]

On Sat, October 6, 2012 12:18 pm, Len Ovens wrote:

> For those of you who are still with me at this point. None of these points
> are particularly bad or good. They are things to remember if a user asks
> questions. Should we include LMMS in US it would be good to remember that
> this really is a standalone application. Not only is it not designed to
> work with other applications, it really just doesn't have the facilities
> to do so. For someone like myself coming from a Linux CLI background of
> "app | app | app" etc. this is broken thinking. But then I have never
> claimed to be normal or some approximation there of. From a windows pov
> maybe this is normal.

The "Road map" for LMMS 1.0 seems to try to deal with almost all the
points I noticed in my last email plus some (multi-layer samples for
example).

-- 
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net