Fonts in the Graphics Meta
coryisatm at gmail.com
Mon Jul 20 21:51:20 BST 2009
Eric Hedekar wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> I was up late working on a poster and for the life of me couldn't find
> the perfect font for the job. That's when I did an 'apt-cache search
> font' and realized that there's a massive cornucopia of font packages
> in the repositories awaiting my install. That's when I thought to
> myself: "Self, why aren't these font packages part of the Ubuntu
> Studio graphics meta package?"
> I think it would be organizationally best (if the list concurs that
> fonts in the graphics package would be good) to have a font meta
> package that is in turn a dependency of the graphics meta (simply
> because the sheer number of font packages would clutter the graphics
> package if added directly). The other question on my mind is "would
> it be okay to include non-free fonts in this meta?" and for that I
> turn the floor over to those more experienced...
I think this is a great idea actually. But, we should only ship free fonts.
@Eric: Could you compile a list of font packages available in Main and
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-devel