license & soundfont

hollunder at hollunder at
Sun Apr 6 20:41:13 BST 2008

On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:57:49 +0100
"Toby Smithe" <tsmithe at> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 2:30 PM,  <hollunder at> wrote:
> > What license must a soundfont be under to make it possible for you
> > to integrate it?
> Any free distribution licence is fine. For instance, I recommended the
> Fluid SoundFont be MIT licensed, mainly because it was closest to what
> the upstream had envisaged as "Public Domain, but please include a
> copyright notice".
GPL would probably also be an option.
It's inconvenient that the cc licenses are not approved by debian, the
possibility to choose some terms would have been nice.
I guess a cc licensed soundfont couldn't get included?


More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-devel mailing list