Wednesday Triage Report (2021-06-09)
Sergio Durigan Junior
sergio.durigan at canonical.com
Wed Jun 9 21:34:49 UTC 2021
On Wednesday, June 09 2021, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:06:02PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> ### https://pad.lv/1931179 - (New) [genshi] -
>> /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/genshi/filters/i18n.py:352:
>> SyntaxWarning: is not with a literal. Did you mean !=?
>>
>> Triaged, subscribed ubuntu-server, but marked as low priority.
>
> Fixed upstream in 0.7.3 and in debian with 0.7.4-2. It needs this
> trivial patch:
>
> https://github.com/edgewall/genshi/pull/33/commits/8646d3b7abbc62f3be96c18849b55dad1ee861cb
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/genshi/-/blob/debian/0.7.4-2/debian/patches/fix-syntax-warning.patch
>
> It's just a warning though, dunno if that's important enough for SRU.
> (If anyone needs SRU practice, this'd be an super easy one.)
Yeah, I don't think this one would fly for an SRU, that's why I didn't
even suggest it to Athos. I think it'd be hard to justify it to the SRU
team, especially because there's no actual bug happening because of this
warning.
>> ### https://pad.lv/1931306 - (New) [postfix] - bionic: postfix-dbgsym
>> package lacks DWARF information
>>
>> I helped the user yesterday on #ubuntu-devel and identified this
>> problem, so it's obviously triaged, but it's low priority. Subscribed
>> ubuntu-server.
>
> Given it's fixed in impish, it might be better to just mark it fix
> released? It seems quite unlikely we'd do an SRU of this (although if
> there's a really straightforward patch maybe it could ride on another
> SRU.)
I'd marked it as Fix Release for impish already. Or maybe you're
referring to something else?
Also, agreed that it's unlikely we'll do an SRU for this. I'm curious
whether a simple rebuild would be enough to fix the issue, but even that
would need an SRU.
Thanks,
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: E92F D0B3 6B14 F1F4 D8E0 EB2F 106D A1C8 C3CB BF14
More information about the ubuntu-server
mailing list