Triage and Migration report - Wed Feb 12, 2020

Steve Langasek steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Thu Feb 13 16:20:57 UTC 2020


On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:30:01AM -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> Okay,
> 
> Do we have a map on components being kept for i386 and their
> dependencies?

The full list of things we're keeping (with rationale) is:

  https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends

this is the output from germinate that specifically shows which binaries we
keep and why.

> I ask you this because of the following situation: I
> could mark the pacemaker/all/i386 as a badtest. It would solve the
> migration problem BUT then, when investigating, I see that:

> pacemaker-resource-agents package (present in amd64 and i386 repos)
> depends on:

This is an architecture: all package.  We don't filter arch: all packages
out of i386, and we do not require them to be installable on i386 (since the
use case for i386 is cross-installing i386 libs on amd64).

If an Arch: all package is in the build-dependency closure for other
packages that we are building on i386, then and only then do we require that
it's installable.

> (c)rafaeldtinoco at clusterx32:~$ apt-cache policy resource-agents
> resource-agents:amd64:
>   Installed: (none)
>   Candidate: 1:4.4.0-1ubuntu1
>   Version table:
>      1:4.4.0-1ubuntu1 500
>         500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
> 
> which is currently unavailable for i386. My doubt is: should we ask
> "resource-agents" to be included back in i386 then ? OR should we try
> to get rid of pacemaker in i386 ? I'm not entirely sure why it is
> being kept while resource-agents was removed... that is why I ask.

No, neither of those things, per the above.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/attachments/20200213/c876ec1f/attachment.sig>


More information about the ubuntu-server mailing list