qcow2 snapshotting: does it influence future IO performance?
jurgen.depicker at let.be
jurgen.depicker at let.be
Thu Mar 31 13:15:35 UTC 2011
Hi Alvin.
I read on your site that you stopped work on a project because LVM
snapshots potentially decreased IO performance, and I also saw that you
worked on a perl project to make copies of VMs, so therefore I address my
question directly to you.
Your work reminded me of something I read some weeks ago on qcow2 on
http://people.gnome.org/~markmc/qcow-image-format.html and which raised my
brows at the time:
"Snapshots - "real snapshots" - are represented in the original image
itself. Each snapshot is a read-only record of the image a past instant.
The original image remains writable and as modifications are made to it, a
copy of the original data is made for any snapshots referring to it. "
I tried to find more info about this, but didn't yet. So here's my
question: does anybody know whether, having made snapshots of a VM during
several stages of its life (clean install, important service installed,
...), affects IO performance of any writes made after snapshotting, as one
could suspect from my quote above?
Regards,
Jürgen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/attachments/20110331/64c656c3/attachment.html>
More information about the ubuntu-server
mailing list