<font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hi Alvin.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I read on your site that you stopped
work on a project because LVM snapshots potentially decreased IO performance,
and I also saw that you worked on a perl project to make copies of VMs,
so therefore I address my question directly to you.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Your work reminded me of something I
read some weeks ago on qcow2 on </font><a href="http://people.gnome.org/~markmc/qcow-image-format.html"><font size=2 face="sans-serif">http://people.gnome.org/~markmc/qcow-image-format.html</font></a><font size=2 face="sans-serif">
and which raised my brows at the time:</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">"</font><font size=3>Snapshots
- "real snapshots" - are represented in the original image itself.
Each snapshot is a read-only record of the image a past instant. The original
image remains writable and as modifications are made to it, a copy of the
original data is made for any snapshots referring to it. </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">"</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I tried to find more info about this,
but didn't yet. So here's my question: does anybody know whether,
having made snapshots of a VM during several stages of its life (clean
install, important service installed, ...), affects IO performance of any
writes made after snapshotting, as one could suspect from my quote above?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Regards,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Jürgen</font>