Ubuntu Server page doesn't mention 10.10?
james at gray.net.au
Sun Jan 16 01:56:00 UTC 2011
On 16/01/2011, at 9:12 AM, Monte Milanuk wrote:
>> Works for me. I can understand why they wouldn't advertise the non-LTS versions up front as server installations generally are designed to last a lot longer than your average desktop, and as a result require longer term support. Lastly, I'd hope anyone looking specifically for a "server" version has experience beyond a desktop user and shouldn't have too much difficulty locating the non-LTS download ;)
> Really? Find it on this page, then.
> Never said I had trouble finding the download.
Didn't say you had problems finding the download. I was simply highlighting:
1. Possible reasons WHY they only mention the LTS versions
2. If you're after a non-LTS version, provided you have an IQ higher than a potted plant, you can't really miss it. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3648 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ubuntu-server