Ubuntu Server page doesn't mention 10.10?
john.pugh at canonical.com
Sun Jan 16 02:20:30 UTC 2011
On 01/15/2011 08:56 PM, James Gray wrote:
> On 16/01/2011, at 9:12 AM, Monte Milanuk wrote:
>>> Works for me. I can understand why they wouldn't advertise the non-LTS versions up front as server installations generally are designed to last a lot longer than your average desktop, and as a result require longer term support. Lastly, I'd hope anyone looking specifically for a "server" version has experience beyond a desktop user and shouldn't have too much difficulty locating the non-LTS download ;)
>> Really? Find it on this page, then.
>> Never said I had trouble finding the download.
> Didn't say you had problems finding the download. I was simply highlighting:
> 1. Possible reasons WHY they only mention the LTS versions
> 2. If you're after a non-LTS version, provided you have an IQ higher than a potted plant, you can't really miss it. :)
No need to get nasty. It is not listed on the ubuntu.com/server page and
that is an error. I've entered bug #703372  against it.
Thanks for the heads up.
More information about the ubuntu-server