Packaging AWS command line tools for Natty
Christophe Sauthier
christophe.sauthier at objectif-libre.com
Tue Oct 19 21:22:38 UTC 2010
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Scott Moser <smoser at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Christophe Sauthier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Scott Moser <smoser at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Mathias Gug wrote:
>> >> Seems like the best option.
>> > That spec would not be the correct place, as
>> > a.) it is discussing improvements to the images themselves
>> > b.) none of the packages Eric mentioned would be in main (uec images only
>> > contain stuff in main).
>>
>> I am sorry Scott, but I am not sure that a package need to be in main
>> to be discused at a UDS. I can remember some cases (not in the server
>> part it is true) where it was discussed while the software were in
>> universe.
>
> Sorry if I was unclear. It is absolutely not a requirement for a package
> to be in main for it to be discussed at UDS.
>
> The requirement is that all packages included in a UEC Image (and, I
> believe other official distribution media) must be in main. Because of
> that, the proposed new packages have nothing to do with uec-images.
Thanks for the clarification Scott !
>
> We can (and will) absolutely discuss packaging new upstream sources. Its
> just that the discussion is not relavant to the uds session that Clint
> mentioned.
OK it makes sense !
Christophe
---
Christophe Sauthier - 06 16 98 63 96
Objectif Libre www.objectif-libre.com
Services et Formations Open Source
More information about the ubuntu-server
mailing list