Server SRU's need verification

[Scott Kitterman]

On Thursday, December 02, 2010 01:16:37 pm Clint Byrum wrote:
Top posting fixed.

> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 14:05 +0200, Imre Gergely wrote:
> > On 11/30/2010 09:42 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > 
> > > So we need to make sure that when SRU's are accepted into *-proposed, a
> > > 3rd party (neither the reporter, nor the fixer) does a verification on
> > > the package.
> > > 
> > > One day a week, as a server team contributor, you should go in to this
> > > list and see if there's a bug you can verify:
> > > 
> > > http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html#ve
> > > rified_bugs
> > 
> > 674645, 659975, 595438 - checked the test cases, and the packages from
> > -proposed, everything seems to work. I've updated the bugreports.
> > 
> > 265058 - I would need an exact test case for this to check, but with the
> > current openvpn package from Hardy I didn't have any problems.
> Imre, you are my hero!
> 
> Thanks, and keep up the great work.
> 
He also does the bulk of the regression testing with all the clamav reverse 
depends that makes it possible to keep it up to date for all supported Ubuntu 
releases. Definite hero material.

Scott K