Server SRU's need verification

[Imre Gergely]

Spent some quality time with this one, 265058 :) I hope I got it.

On 12/02/2010 08:16 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Imre, you are my hero!
>
> Thanks, and keep up the great work.
>
> On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 14:05 +0200, Imre Gergely wrote:
>> On 11/30/2010 09:42 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> So we need to make sure that when SRU's are accepted into *-proposed, a
>>> 3rd party (neither the reporter, nor the fixer) does a verification on
>>> the package.
>>>
>>> One day a week, as a server team contributor, you should go in to this
>>> list and see if there's a bug you can verify:
>>>
>>> http://people.canonical.com/~chucks/SRUTracker/sru-tracker-bugs.html#verified_bugs
>> 674645, 659975, 595438 - checked the test cases, and the packages from
>> -proposed, everything seems to work. I've updated the bugreports.
>>
>> 265058 - I would need an exact test case for this to check, but with the
>> current openvpn package from Hardy I didn't have any problems.
>>
>> -- 
>> Imre Gergely
>> Yahoo!: gergelyimre | ICQ#: 101510959
>> MSN: gergely_imre | GoogleTalk: gergelyimre
>> gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0x34525305
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Imre Gergely
Yahoo!: gergelyimre | ICQ#: 101510959
MSN: gergely_imre | GoogleTalk: gergelyimre
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0x34525305