AppArmor update proposal

Rodrigo Figueiredo Zaiden rodrigo.zaiden at canonical.com
Thu Sep 5 17:15:32 UTC 2024



On 04/09/2024 19:32, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 5 Sept 2024 at 03:31, Rodrigo Figueiredo Zaiden 
> <rodrigo.zaiden at canonical.com <mailto:rodrigo.zaiden at canonical.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     The Ubuntu Security team has a proposed update for the AppArmor
>     userspace utilities in focal and jammy ready to move forward that we
>     would like the help of the SRU or archive admin teams.
> 
>     The updates are in the proposed pocket as of now [1][2], but given the
>     sensitivity of the issue [3], we would like to propose it to be rolled
>     out to the updates pocket in stages. 
> 
> 
> This is the default way updates are released: https://canonical-sru- 
> docs.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/explanation/standard-processes/ 
> #phasing <https://canonical-sru-docs.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/ 
> explanation/standard-processes/#phasing> -- are you asking for this to 
> happen in a more gradual way for these packages?
> 

The default phasing is good enough.
No need to happen in a more gradual way.

Thanks,
Rodrigo


> Cheers,
> mwh
> 
>     We would like the new version
>     (currently in proposed) promoted to the updates pocket by the SRU team.
> 
>     Additionally, we performed a no-change rebuild of the prior version in
>     the updates pocket for both releases into the corresponding security
>     pocket [4][5] to ensure that it is possible for users to relatively easily
>     rollback to the prior version without regressing the prior fixes that
>     had landed in those releases.
> 
>     We have already communicated the update through the bug itself [3]
>     and also via a discourse post [6], and we have had a few comments (in
>     the bug) that no issues were found in addition to our own testing,
>     which is making us confident to move forward with the update using
>     a safe strategy.
> 
>     Is that something we can have help with?
> 
>     [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/3.0.4-2ubuntu2.4
>     <https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/3.0.4-2ubuntu2.4>
>     [2] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/2.13.3-7ubuntu5.4
>     <https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/2.13.3-7ubuntu5.4>
>     [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1597017 <https://
>     bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1597017>
>     [4] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/
>     apparmor/3.0.4-2ubuntu2.3build2 <https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/
>     apparmor/3.0.4-2ubuntu2.3build2>
>     [5] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/
>     apparmor/2.13.3-7ubuntu5.3build2 <https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/
>     apparmor/2.13.3-7ubuntu5.3build2>
>     [6]
>     https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/upcoming-apparmor-security-update-for-
>     cve-2016-1585/44268 <https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/upcoming-apparmor-
>     security-update-for-cve-2016-1585/44268>
> 
>     Thanks!
>     Rodrigo
> 
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     Ubuntu-release mailing list
>     Ubuntu-release at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Ubuntu-release at lists.ubuntu.com>
>     Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/
>     listinfo/ubuntu-release <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/
>     ubuntu-release>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20240905/140e2a4c/attachment.sig>


More information about the Ubuntu-release mailing list