autopkgtest for openjdk-lts
Steve Langasek
steve.langasek at ubuntu.com
Thu Jul 7 23:22:55 UTC 2022
On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 03:21:01PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> I happened to be looking at long running tests in the autopkgtest
> database today and discovered openjdk-lts has a rather long run time.
> This then resulted in me looking at the autopkgtest-package-configs
> where I found the following:
> big_packages:openjdk-lts/amd64
> big_packages:openjdk-lts/arm64
> big_packages:openjdk-lts/armhf
> big_packages:openjdk-lts/i386
> big_packages:openjdk-lts/ppc64el
> big_packages:openjdk-lts/s390x
> never_run:openjdk-lts/arm64/bionic
> never_run:openjdk-lts/arm64/focal
> never_run:openjdk-lts/arm64/groovy
> never_run:openjdk-lts/arm64/hirsute
> never_run:openjdk-lts/armhf/bionic
> never_run:openjdk-lts/armhf/hirsute
> never_run:openjdk-lts/i386/bionic
> never_run:openjdk-lts/ppc64el/bionic
> never_run:openjdk-lts/s390x/bionic
> Given that openjdk-lts's test results[1] are neutral could we just move it
> to never run?
> [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/openjdk-lts
openjdk-lts sees security updates every 3 months which carry with them a
significant risk of regression due to the complexity of both the package and
the patches that are included upstream in security drops. Please do not
move it to never_run, we definitely want to know when these test results go
from 'neutral' to 'failed'.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20220707/a9f6ebce/attachment.sig>
More information about the Ubuntu-release
mailing list