Is a 16.04 alpha 2 needed?

[flocculant at gmx.co.uk]

On 26/01/16 06:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:42:07PM -0800, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
>> I think it's worthwhile doing alphas, especially for an LTS version.
> Could you elaborate what value you see that you're getting out of these
> alphas, that couldn't be achieved more effectively by e.g. automated install
> testing against the daily images?
Just a quick note on this (Xubuntu aren't going to participate in A2) - 
the auto install testing of images only happens for Ubuntu afaik. There 
was some effort during last cycle to get it going for flavours again 
which appears to have stalled.
> [snip]
>
>
regards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20160126/18823878/attachment.html>