Is a 16.04 alpha 2 needed?

[Martin Wimpress]

Hi,

Ubuntu MATE would like to participate in 16.04 Alpha 2. If no one else is
able I might be able to volunteer. I'll confirm later if I can get the
required time off work.

Regards, Martin.
On 26 Jan 2016 05:38, "Steve Langasek" <steve.langasek at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> According to <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule>, this
> is
> the week we would plan to do Alpha 2 for Xenial if there was a need for
> one.
>
> And according to <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseTaskSignup>,
> no
> one has signed up to do any of the work for this particular alpha
> milestone.
>
> Is this alpha needed by any of the teams?  The thought some time ago was
> that the continuous installability guarantees of proposed-migration would
> make specific alpha milestones unnecessary.  The Ubuntu team have been
> making use of this now for several cycles to great effect.  Are other
> flavors still finding these alphas necessary, or is the system of
> continuously-installable images working for you?  Does someone wish to step
> forward to drive alpha 2?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
> Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
> Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
> slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
>
> --
> Ubuntu-release mailing list
> Ubuntu-release at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20160126/a29f78ab/attachment-0001.html>