Juju SRU and QA plans

[Tim]

On 08/10/14 22:34, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:32:27 Robie Basak wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:30:49PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
>>> If upstream doesn't intend to reuse version numbers...
>> Right. I've discussed this with upstream and they have committed to not
>> re-using version numbers that they have proposed for release and then
>> don't release.
> If they aren't going to reuse the version number, why not go ahead and 
> release?  Seems much simpler workflow wise and if there's a problem, they're 
> bumping to a new version anyway.  Nothing says they have to advertise the new 
> release until after things are all verified.
Or they could just use 9.9x version for RC's like most other upstream projects do, and bump to final once its verified
>
> Scott K
>