Juju SRU and QA plans

[Robie Basak]

On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 07:34:12AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> If they aren't going to reuse the version number, why not go ahead and 
> release?  Seems much simpler workflow wise and if there's a problem, they're 
> bumping to a new version anyway.  Nothing says they have to advertise the new 
> release until after things are all verified.

This comes down to what we mean by "release". Given that they won't
re-use the version number, we might as well say that they are doing
exactly what you suggest: they are "releasing", but just not advertising
the new "release" except to testers.

Technically, that's not any different to what they are doing right now.
It's just semantics.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20141008/17fd86f1/attachment-0001.pgp>