Beta Process - reworked - DRAFT available for discussion.

Kate Stewart kate at
Tue Sep 17 01:52:11 UTC 2013

Hi Release Team,
    I didn't see any feedback on
so I've assumed its close enough, and replaced BetaProcess with it.    It
can be reverted if folks disagree. I saw Colin made some edits to both
earlier today, and there's just no point in
keeping two copies around.

Hi Adam,
   Since I see you're down for this cycle for the checklist tracking [1],
do all the tasks that were scheduled to be done today (Release minus 10
days) still make sense from Canonical's perspective?   There were some I'd
question.   If they're no longer applicable, can you please delete them so
we can clean up the list to just what is actually needed?

Hi Pete,
    Are you still going to be putting together the release notes for this
Beta [1]?   Or with your new role, is this a gap?

Thanks, Kate


On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Kate Stewart <kate at> wrote:

> Dear Release Team members and Flavor Release Managers,
>     After going through the optional beta 1 last week, its pretty clear
> that some tasks are not really applicable for the opt-in,  others only make
> sense when /testing is being used for ubuntu and ubuntu-server, etc.
>     I've taken a first pass at splitting up the tasks to reflect if they
> should be done in the opt-in beta or the final beta.   There are '?' where
> its worth discussing what should be done.   The document is a first attempt
> and framework - there's probably a lot more to discuss than those I've
> noted with a '?'.  ;-)
>     Please see:
> the original:
> has not been touched and is available for comparison purposes.
> Lets discuss this on the list and see if we can get the '?' resolved,  and
> then when we're happy replace the BetaProcess with BetaProcessReworked
> content.
> Thanks, Kate
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Ubuntu-release mailing list