[QA] Release Meeting 2012-03-09

Martin Pitt martin.pitt at ubuntu.com
Fri Mar 9 09:56:02 UTC 2012

Jean-Baptiste Lallement [2012-03-08 18:17 +0000]:
>  * precise-upgrade-lucid-universe
> [Bug 940179] upgrade does not replace libjeg62-dev with libjpeg-turbo8-dev
> Fix released but upgrade still failing on resolution of dependencies.

The reason is a different one now. As I didn't see a qa-daily-report
bug report about it yet, I filed bug 950676 with an initial analysis.
I think I'm going to need Michael's help on that one.

> === Boot speed Testing ===
>  Boot speed is back
>  http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/boot-speed/
>  /!\ Important regression in boot speed: +35s to 40s in plumbing

This seems to be due to a new "apparmor_parser" process which is
running for some 40 (!) seconds. Jamie, could you please have a look
at this?

> == What was done engineering wise? ==
>  * Kernel SRU: Automated testing of Kernels on Bare-Metal
> (Lucid->Oneiric) and VMs (Hardy->Oneiric)
>    Results: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/SRU%20Kernel/


>  * auto-upgrade-testing isolated from update-manager code and moved
> to its own project.
>    https://launchpad.net/auto-upgrade-testing

Is it possible to widen the committers for that project a bit? I
sometimes stumble over stuff that should be tested on upgrade, so if
e. g. core-devs could just add tests there, that might be helpful? Or
do you prefer MPs to ensure that tests stay consistent? (Which sounds
fine, depends on the amount of review you would like to do)


Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20120309/a3cfa6e4/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Ubuntu-release mailing list