Rejection of libart-lgpl SRU

Adam Stokes adam.stokes at canonical.com
Mon Jul 30 13:58:39 UTC 2012


On 07/29/2012 06:15 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 07/29/2012 08:44 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> SRU's should be miminal changes to fix the bug in question.
>>
>> Of these items:
>>
>> +libart-lgpl (2.3.21-1ubuntu1) precise-proposed; urgency=low
>> +
>> +  * Use dpkg source format 3.0 (quilt).
>> +  * Drop debian/patches/70_relibtoolize.patch and use dh-autoreconf instead 
>> to
>> +    update the build system.
>> +  * Bump debhelper compat level to 9.
>> +  * Stip debian/tmp/ from .install files.
>> +  * Convert to multiarch. Closes: #661714 (lp: #977964)
>> +  * Drop libtool .la file.
>> +  * Add Vcs-* fields.
>> +  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3.
>> +  * Add symbols file for libart-2.0-2.
>>
>> As far as I can tell, only "Convert to multiarch." is addressing a bug.  Is 
>> addressing a bug.  There is 186.0 KiB of diff here and only one there's only 
>> three lines of code that're changed due to multiarch.
>>
>> For an SRU, please make it truly minimal.
>>
>> Scott K
> I see that the already was a comment regarding this in the bug, but I
> think it's worth mentioning on this mailing-list too in case anyone else
> is working on similar bugs
>
> All multi-arch changes are expected to come with the result of an
> rdepends rebuild test using the new library. This is required to ensure
> buildability of the archive after moving the libraries and other files
> to the multi-arch path.
>
> It sounds like the uploading for this package went a bit out of sync
> with the bug report as I don't see any reply to Chris' comment (#8)
> asking for the rebuild results.
>
>
There was mention of a script used that aided in testing rdepends. Is
there a link to a project page or something I can grab to add those
testing results?

Thanks,
Adam



More information about the Ubuntu-release mailing list