I have written a draft for the Reporting Bugs guide

[Peter Matulis]

I find it odd how the Ubuntu help wiki suggests mailing list and/or IRC
discussions in order for something to be changed [1] since this is not
normal for a wiki. I'm guessing that newcomers completely miss this
guidance principle. Invoking the Ubuntu Code of Conduct is also
heavy-handed for a wiki.

As for the current discussion, any topic that generates this level of
passion should probably reside in the actual documentation where peer
reviews are integral to the editing process.

[1]: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WikiGuide/Communication

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 4:11 PM, chris hermansen <clhermansen at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Walter and everyone else,
>
> (Stuff deleted)
>
>
> >
> Regardless of your feelings, the entire community is based on consensus.
> It's baked into the Code of Conduct. If you're impatient on how long that
> process takes (often a long time), I think it might be better to find a
> place where every commit is automatically accepted, although I think you'll
> have a hard time finding that place.
>
>
>
>
>
> Might it be possible to arrive at a compromise?
>
> I am thinking that there may be a solution acceptable to both points of
> view, and that would be a brief summary of the steps up front, each step
> ending in a "read more..." link to the detailed description below.
>
> If I'm wrong please pardon the interruption.
>
> Chris Hermansen
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>