Ubuntu servers: different servers have different packages, leading to some issues
Pierre Equoy
pierre.equoy at gmail.com
Mon Apr 21 14:50:46 UTC 2014
Hi there,
First of all, if this topic is not quality-related, please let me know who
I should contact for this.
I had a lot of small issues today while installing Ubuntu 14.04 on my
laptop. For instance, I could not install the proprietary nvidia drivers
[1] (there was some unmet dependencies issues), nor Skype (from the partner
repository, same here, unmet dependencies with skype-bin package)
In the end, it looks like they were all linked to the server used to
retrieve the package list/updates.
After I changed it from Taiwan (it was set automatically during the
install, I guess this option is parsed from the location you set during the
installation?) to Main Server, and did the necesary "sudo apt-get update",
it was much better.
After switching from the Taiwanese server to the Main one, and doing a
"sudo apt-get upgrade", I got the following list of packages to update
(from a fresh install):
--------------------
The following packages will be upgraded:
chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra liboil0.3 liboxideqt-qmlplugin
liboxideqtcore0 libva1 oxideqt-codecs
qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-ui-extras-browser-plugin
qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-ui-extras-browser-plugin-assets
webapp-container webbrowser-app
10 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
--------------------
Do you think it's normal that different servers provide different packages?
It was very misleading for me...
A few questions:
- is there a document listing the different servers?
- who is responsible for synchronizing the different servers so they all
contain the same packages?
- could this be considered a bug? If so, under what "component" should I
file it?
Thanks in advance for your feedback!
[1] For more info, please refer to
http://askubuntu.com/questions/451862/ubuntu-14-04-nvidia-drivers-cannot-be-installed
--
Pierre Equoy
More information about the Ubuntu-quality
mailing list