QATracker Survey: Time for a new look?

[Adrian Goodyer]

Oops! Cheers for the catch Nicholas :-)

The concept I was impressed most in Pasi's design was his focus to place
information closest to where he thought most useful. In line with this I
made my suggestion; when I am testing I often have the testcase open and so
on that page would be the most relevant place for the link locations.

So with this in mind, I think the link locations you suggested would work
perfectly.

Ade.


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Nicholas Skaggs <
nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com> wrote:

>  I think Adrian meant for this to hit everyone :-)
>
> That said, Adrian I added the links at the top of the page in the
> announcement area talking about how to use the tool. Should we add a link
> there to the bug documentation? Would that work?
>
> Nicholas
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------  Subject: Re: QATracker Survey: Time
> for a new look?  Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:39:29 +0100  From: Adrian
> Goodyer <adriangoodyer at gmail.com> <adriangoodyer at gmail.com>  To: Nicholas
> Skaggs <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com> <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>
>
> Great work Pasi, this is sure to make the reporting process a lot quicker
> and easier.
>
> I remembered when I first started submitting test case results, the main
> thing I struggled with was how to report bugs in unusual dialogue screens
> (e.g. during installs) and then how to report correctly.
>
> For the sake of newer testers would it be possible to link to this
> information somewhere in this page?
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-quality mailing list
> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20130624/6ed7bfee/attachment.html>