Cadence Week 1 is here!
Nicholas Skaggs
nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
Wed Jun 19 04:42:20 UTC 2013
That's a shortcut button :-) click on the link to see the testcase itself:
*http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/291/builds/46578/testcases/1430/results
*Nicholas*
*
On 06/18/2013 08:35 PM, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion. In some of the testcases, I noticed there was
> only an option to submit a pass result but not a failed result.
> Example:
> http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/291/builds/46578/testcases
>
> This testcase only has a "pass with no bugs". If it failed, submitting
> a bug report will be the next course of action. I was wondering if we
> could also have to option to write a comment to notify of anything
> interesting we may come across during the test
>
> Istimsak Abdulbasir
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Nicholas Skaggs
> <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Istimsak,
> Transmission is fixed -- third time is the charm, I'm sure of it! :-)
>
> What do you mean by passing a failed result? The best place to
> store critical information intended for developers is in your bug
> report :-) Are you wanting to pass feedback along even if the test
> passes? I need a little more detail here on what your after :-)
>
> Vasudevan,
> Thanks for sharing your notes. On the unity testcases most of them
> are probably just updates we need to do to the testcase as you said.
> Each cycle they tweak things and our tests can get behind :-) For
> the rest I'll just leave my comments in your doc:-)
>
> On the introspection piece, if nautilus has got you down, you can
> try some of the new QML apps. Despite Carla's habit of
> finding weird things with autopilot (breaking things is a
> wonderful trait for a tester, go carla!), they are much easier and
> more straightforward
> to write tests for. Consider picking up a test or two there to
> keep your sanity -- fighting with a GTK app can get to you, trust
> me! Have a look here
> for the list of the needed tests:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/CoreApps/Testing
>
> Thanks!
>
> Nicholas
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Istimsak Abdulbasir
> <saqman2060 at gmail.com <mailto:saqman2060 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> This package does not a proper testcase associated with it.
>
> http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/293/builds
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Istimsak Abdulbasir
> <saqman2060 at gmail.com <mailto:saqman2060 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> We also need the option pass a failed result and to write
> comments on our findings. We won't be give critical
> information back to the developers if there is no way of
> explaining our findings.
>
> Istimsak Abdulbasir
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Nicholas Skaggs
> <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
> <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>> wrote:
>
> Ok, I added testcases for these products that somehow
> failed to push the first time :-)
>
> Simple Scan
> Brasero
> System Settings
> Transmission
>
> In addition installation instructions should exist for
> all packages. Thanks!
>
>
> Nicholas
>
> On 06/15/2013 09:59 PM, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote:
>> I am unable to view the testing procedures for some
>> of the package milestones for this weeks cadence
>> testing.
>>
>> http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/286/builds/46575/downloads
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Nicholas Skaggs
>> <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>> <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Whew! See that went quicker than expected ;-)
>> Everything should be up now, please ping if you
>> find a gap.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Nicholas
>>
>>
>> On 06/14/2013 06:25 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
>>> Alright, I know several of you are particularly
>>> excited about this. Our first cadence week is
>>> here. Starting June 15th, we'll be testing
>>> images and packages over the course of the next
>>> week. So what is cadence testing? Have a look at
>>> this page to get more information:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Cadence
>>>
>>> In short, as a community we're testing different
>>> things about every ~2 weeks in ubuntu, and
>>> sharing results to flesh out bugs and problem
>>> areas. The full schedule is here, but note the
>>> release schedule changed TODAY, so this will be
>>> updated as well to reflect those changes very soon.
>>>
>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Cadence/Saucy
>>>
>>> So what's up for testing this week? The daily
>>> images, the default applications in ubuntu
>>> (we'll start tracking them all throughout the
>>> cycle) and a new version of alsa testing. Full
>>> details are here:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Cadence/Saucy/Week1
>>>
>>> If you need help submitting results, have a look
>>> at this page,
>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/QATracker, and
>>> the walkthroughs listed. Of particular interest
>>> is the ISO testing and Cadence Week testing
>>> walkthroughs.
>>>
>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Cadence/Walkthrough
>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/ISO/Walkthrough
>>>
>>> Do note that you don't need anything special to
>>> participate in cadence week testing! Both an
>>> installed version of the development branch of
>>> ubuntu (aka saucy) in a VM or on a real box, or
>>> even a live session of the lastest daily image
>>> will work.
>>>
>>> Good luck! Bear in mind this is the first week
>>> for our new format, so there may be growing
>>> pains. Feedback is very much appreciated. Thanks
>>> and Happy Testing everyone,
>>>
>>> Nicholas
>>>
>>> PS. A note; as of this email, I am still adding
>>> the ubuntu default apps, slowly but surely to
>>> the package tracker. They should be there before
>>> tomorrow :-) Also the version tracking is still
>>> coming online in case your watching :-)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-quality mailing list
>> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
>> <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20130619/69f12f60/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 642 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20130619/69f12f60/attachment-0001.gif>
More information about the Ubuntu-quality
mailing list