Fwd: [Bug 1183009] Re: Test Needed: Gimp

Pierre Equoy pierre.equoy at gmail.com
Tue Jun 18 04:59:59 UTC 2013


The Gimp 2.8 release notes page <
http://www.gimp.org/release-notes/gimp-2.8.html> includes some features we
should test.


   - Single-Window Mode [test already written]
   - Save And Export
   - Layer Groups
   - Tools Drawn With Cairo
   - On-Canvas Text Editing
   - Keyboard Shortcut Changes
   - Simple Math In Size Entries
   - Cage Transform Tool

I will raise an issue in launchpad with this list, so once the issue is
closed, we will cover the basic new features from Gimp 2.8.



On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Pierre Equoy <pierre.equoy at gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks, Nicholas, that makes a lot of sense!
>
> I will review the main features of Gimp when I have some spare time, and
> build up some bug description to improve the manual test cases.
>
> I saw the first cadence has started, and all of a sudden I understood how
> these manual test cases were used by the community. Awesome! :)
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>  On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Nicholas Skaggs <
> nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com> wrote:
>
>>  Pierre, if there are specific things that should be added to the gimp
>> testcase, simply file a new bug for them :-) Otherwise, continuously
>> improving testcases is the name of the game so anyone is free to add things
>> to it at any time. The lack of a bug doesn't stop you from improving a test.
>>
>> That said, indeed it may not get as much attention if there are no open
>> bugs, so I would encourage you to open a new bug describing the tests still
>> needed. Most of the bugs on the tracker call for the initial testcase of
>> the package. Once an initial test has been written and that bug is closed,
>> we can consider filing additional bugs for specific tests needed against
>> the package if we want to ensure the testcase is expanded to include those
>> testcases. I trust that makes sense!
>>
>> Nicholas
>>
>>
>> On 06/17/2013 03:08 AM, Pierre Equoy wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>>  I am assigned to the manual test cases writing for Gimp.
>>
>>  I wrote a bunch of tests the other night, but I was thinking of writing
>> others later on.
>>
>>  Yet, I received a notification (see below) to tell me it was Fixed.
>>
>>  How do you work for this kind of continuous improvement tasks, where
>> tests may be added with time for a given package?
>>
>>  If this issue is marked as Fixed, I'm afraid no one is going to work to
>> improve the Gimp test cases...
>>
>>  Thanks in advance for your clarifications!
>>
>>
>>  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jackson Doak <Doak.jackson at gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:25 PM
>> Subject: [Bug 1183009] Re: Test Needed: Gimp
>> To: pierre.equoy at gmail.com
>>
>>
>> ** Changed in: ubuntu-manual-tests
>>        Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
>>
>> --
>> You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1183009
>>
>> Title:
>>   Test Needed: Gimp
>>
>> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bug/1183009/+subscriptions
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Pierre Equoy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-quality mailing list
>> Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Pierre Equoy
>
>


-- 
Pierre Equoy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20130618/fa8fd8ac/attachment.html>


More information about the Ubuntu-quality mailing list