Manual Application Testing plans for beta1

chris hermansen clhermansen at gmail.com
Mon Mar 5 18:08:02 UTC 2012


I use LibreOffice a lot - particularly Write; if I can be of help there
please let me know.

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Nicholas Skaggs <
nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com> wrote:

>  Chris, yes you should still file them locally. If the issue is an
> upstream one (and not ubuntu specific), the bug should get upstreamed. You
> may be asked to do this, or you can do this yourself if you wish by opening
> a bug upstream and linking it to the lp bug. However, it's important to
> report bugs to lp first, as they may be ubuntu specific.
>
> On a semi-related note, I'm trying to help get some more libreoffice tests
> for beta2.. the libreoffice team has been responsive so far, so fingers
> crossed ;-)
>
> Nicholas
>
>
> On 03/05/2012 12:33 PM, chris hermansen wrote:
>
> I checked this morning (Vancouver time) and this problem has already been
> reported in Precise, so I added myself to the bug and also a few details.
>
> Any comment on my other question with regard to testing LibreOffice - bug
> reports in Launchpad or upstream?
>
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Nicholas Skaggs <
> nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com> wrote:
>
>>  Agreed. Use ubuntu-bug packagename and file a bug with any weirdness you
>> see, as part of testing the beta or not :-)  Thanks for testing!
>>
>>
>> Nicholas
>>
>>
>> On 03/05/2012 03:14 AM, Brendan Donegan wrote:
>>
>> On 04/03/12 23:28, chris hermansen wrote:
>>
>> Two questions about beta testing:
>>
>>    1. I have found a bug outside the checkbox series; after I have
>>    entered my password on the nice new login screen, and just before the gray
>>    screen comes up as we proceed into unity 2-d, I briefly see a scrambled
>>    version of the login screen with bits of password boxes all over the
>>    screen.  Do I report this as a normal bug on Launchpad, or is there some
>>    special way of reporting a Beta bug?
>>
>>  I've seen something like this too. Report a normal bug in Launchpad
>> against the lightdm package.
>>
>>
>>    1. a couple of weeks ago I was preparing a large complex report with
>>    Libre Office in 11.10 and I noticed a couple of things that didn't work
>>    quite right with charts embedded in a table.  I want to test them in the
>>    new 3.5 beta in 12.04.  Do I file bug reports on Launchpad for this, or do
>>    I go upstream?
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Nicholas Skaggs <
>> nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Beta1 is out! The ppa containing checkbox and some tests is available.
>>> Download the iso, load the ppa and give testing a whirl! Thanks everyone
>>> who contributed to the tests, and thanks in advance for testing.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.theorangenotebook.com/2012/03/opportunity-manual-application-testing.html
>>>
>>> Happy Testing,
>>>
>>> Nicholas
>>>
>>> On 02/29/2012 05:13 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Dave -- if you don't otherwise get a request in (it can be really
>>> basic, there's a job for software center already ;-) ), I will try and get
>>> a test written around these lines. If we don't have this for beta1, that's
>>> ok. Beta2 should offer a much more full set of tests -- they'll just
>>> continue to grow.
>>>
>>> Nicholas
>>>
>>> On 02/29/2012 06:37 AM, Dave Morley wrote:
>>>
>>> On 28/02/12 19:20, Nicholas Skaggs wrote:
>>> > For those of you who haven't seen/heard, we are planning on testing
>>> > our default applications using checkbox for beta1. See this blog
>>> > post for more details and submit some merge requests for tests :-)
>>> > Or plan on participating and running the tests via checkbox. Thanks
>>> > everyone!
>>>
>>> >
>>> http://www.theorangenotebook.com/2012/02/opportunity-manual-application-testing.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Nicholas
>>>
>>>
>>> Nicholas I would love to write a manual plan for testing software
>>> center but currently I am completely raced off my feet.  If I get some
>>> down time I'll have a look at throwing something together.
>>>
>>> in the meantime key tests should be:
>>> install a gui based app
>>> ensure icon appears in the launcher
>>> sync to another pc/vm instance
>>> install a 0$ app (or a paid for one that utilises the ppa system)
>>> reinstall previous purchase on a second system
>>> removal of an app
>>> ensure icon is removed from app launcher
>>>
>>> That should give you a good ground work if I don't get time till the
>>> release it out (fingers crossed I will though)
>>>
>>>  >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
>>> Ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chris Hermansen · clhermansen at gmail.com
>>
>> C'est ma façon de parler.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
>> Ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Chris Hermansen · clhermansen at gmail.com
>
> C'est ma façon de parler.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-qa mailing list
> Ubuntu-qa at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
>
>


-- 
Chris Hermansen · clhermansen at gmail.com

C'est ma façon de parler.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20120305/8c712666/attachment.html>


More information about the Ubuntu-qa mailing list