packaging greasemonkey scripts
Nick Ellery
nick.ellery at ubuntu.com
Wed Jun 17 03:30:30 UTC 2009
Woops, sent this specifically to Brian.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <nick.ellery at ubuntu.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: packaging greasemonkey scripts
To: Brian Murray <brian at ubuntu.com>
Hi,
> The scripts haven't had to be updated very often recently - once every
> couple of months. However, to prevent having to perform lots of Stable
> Release Updates we are learning towards only including them in a PPA.
I agree that usage of a PPA would make more sense. For the most part,
the only people that use these scripts are people who understand PPAs,
so there shouldn't be much difficulty with installation. A unified
script would be nice, however I would still like to see some way in
which you can install a specific script on its own, be it through a
package for each script, or one for all.
Thanks,
Nick
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20090616/e94e4c0f/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Ubuntu-qa
mailing list