As per yesterday's request
Dave Morley
davmor2 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 31 15:53:13 UTC 2008
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 08:45 -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Dave Morley <davmor2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've thrown together a general wiki page on bug report layouts with my
> > thoughts on why it's useful and what should be filled in where. Please
> > make sure it makes sense and it is usable.
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Bug-Report-Layout
> >
> > Feel free to make it better, but keep in mind it needs to be flexible
> > there is a wide range of bugs to report using it :)
>
> Was there any consensus on what to do with "test case"? We can just
> add it, but I'm a little concerned with our overloaded meanings.
>
> -Jordan
>
I personally don't think it is needed as the step to follow is basically
the test case so I can't see the value in repeating it. Plus most
dev's/triagers aren't interested in going to a different site to see the
test we were running. So KISS rule applies here I think.
--
Seek That Thy Might Know
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20080731/9d974a07/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Ubuntu-qa
mailing list