Launchpad enhancements prioritisation process

[Steve Beattie]

[I tried to raise the following point in the IRC meeting, but the topic
 had moved on by the time I figured out how to articulate it, so I'm
 raising it here.]

On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 09:39:03AM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> 1  Package-specific reporting guidelines

Much like the weather-report landing pages, I suspect some package
aggregation here would be useful (for example, a common set of GNOME
reporting guidelines vs. KDE, vs. xfce4 vs. x.org etc.). Would it be
useful if launchpad supported some notion of subprojects or some other
way of grouping/partitioning to do this?

I worry that something like this would be really only relevant to
the Ubuntu project, as its role as a package aggregator is a somewhat
different usage scenario than most launchpad hosted projects.

-- 
Steve Beattie
<sbeattie at ubuntu.com>
http://NxNW.org/~steve/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20080806/76f79f28/attachment.pgp>