Some new bughelper results

[David Farning]

On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 15:01 +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 10:27:31PM -0600, David Farning wrote:
> > I posted some new bughelper results at
> > 
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs/Bughelper/Results
> > 
> > 
> > They include the confirmed state this week:)
> 
> 
> Hmmm ... I would prefer something more structured like:
> 
> I. List of bugs that need initial contact
> 
>  ... <list>
> 
> II. List of bugs that need a crash report
> 
> III. List of bugs that need a retrace
> 
> ... (e.g. for tags)
> 
> IX. all bugs that might be ready for transition them to next state
> 
> XI. List of bugs that have an inconsitent state and need to be recategorized
> 
> XII. Pairs of bugs that might be duplicates of current hot issues.
> 
> XII. a) Hot Issue A (e.g. totem destructor crashers)
>    ...
>      b) Hot Issue B (e.g. gtk_restyle crashers) 
> 
>  - Alexander
> 

I agree that layout would be more helpful.  But the current design is to
pull a bug from LP, seach it, output the results.  It would take a
redesign to sort.

I'll put in a RFE and see where it goes.  It is written in python so it
shouldn't be too much work to dump the output to a dict and sort it
rather than go directly ot stdout.

david 

David Farning <dfarning at gmail.com>