motu-release

[Steve Langasek]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:32:13PM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> Agreed. Delegating freeze decisions for a set of packages matches very much 
> what we've done with delegates so far :).

> motu-release chose the relevant delegates themselves. With "decisions in terms 
> of freeze exceptions", I meant that not motu-release chooses delegates, but 
> any team can handle freeze exception requests for a given subset of packages 
> how the team think it's best. Of course this should include a responsibility 
> to ask the release-team in case of potentially contentious packages.

That's precisely the model that I'm arguing against.  If there are to be
delegations here, they should be decided on a per-team basis, not as a
blanket policy.  So not "any team can handle" - only teams for which we
identify delegates that we're confident are on the same page with the rest
of the release team.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20100217/cf681c91/attachment.pgp