motu-sru needs you

[Nicolas Valcárcel]

On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 01:42 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> speaking of it, I'm interested where you'd draw the border between
> what should 
> go into -security and -updates.

For -security i will said updates that close CVE's, specially if that
involves medium to critical security fixes, the rest to updates

> Also, I'd be interested about a personal nitpick: The ghc6 package as
> in 
> intrepid right now, hasn't seen a new upstream version since hardy,
> but was 
> updated with a number of fixes since then, a few irrelevant to hardy
> (e.g. 
> adding a script that produces some output during the time-taking
> build, so 
> that slow buildds won't fail due to timeout), but some which fix imho 
> important bugs. How would you react if I'd request the current version
> in 
> intrepid to go into hardy-updates?

I would suggest to use -backports instead of -updates, since it will be
the same package as the one in the devel release, so that would be my
suggestion.

-- 
aka nxvl
Key fingerprint = BCE4 27A0 D03E 55DE DA2D  BE06 891D 8DEE 6545 97FE
gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 654597FE