motu-release

[Stefan Potyra]

Hi,

first off, I'm happy that all motu-release members are ok to go for intrepid 
as well. Imho it was a good working team during hardy, and has fulfilled its 
purpose well.

Nonetheless, I believe it's also important to look at things that didn't go so 
well, and I'd like to start this with some personal observations regarding 
members of motu-release. Please don't get me wrong here, I don't want to 
flame anyone here, as I believe all motu-release members did a great job, but 
it's imho important to also point out what still could be improved. Everyone 
please also post your observerations in regards to motu-release in this 
thread.

So, that's what I've been observing:
Imho the most driving force of motu-release was Scott, thanks a lot! We 
wouldn't have managed the release without you.

Cesare also did a good job at working through motu-release bugs, though 
sometimes he was lacking activity. (not too sure why, my guess is that Cesare 
felt he couldn't make a decisions for some packages. Hey the worst decision 
is to not make one, and have FFe requests unanswered ;))

Sarah, while having great skills and knowledge, I've seen rarely activity in 
regards to motu-release/FFe's.

Luke, the same I wrote in regards to Sarah applies as well.

So my question still stands: what do we do with motu-release for intrepid. 
Subquestions are: what do you (members of motu-release) would like to add, 
what did you observer generally in regards to motu-release, what to improve?

Finally, would anyone new like to apply for motu-relase, and what would he/she 
think to add to the team?

Cheers,
   Stefan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20080628/228568fa/attachment.pgp