mplayer should be moved to universe
Cesare Tirabassi
norsetto at ubuntu.com
Sun Jun 1 11:12:33 BST 2008
On Sunday 01 June 2008 04:15:12 Stefan Potyra wrote:
> hm... if only patent issues are a problem, I'd like to know what patents
> can actually cover. If patents only limit usage, but not distribution, I
> see no problems with putting mplayer sources in universe, and building
> binary mencoder packages in multiverse. Can someone clarify this?
A quick check with apt-cache shows the following mplayer bd to be in
multiverse (because of mencoder):
em8300-headers
libfaac-dev
liblame-dev
libx264-dev
libxvidcore4-dev
I have not checked them all in detail, but I have the impression they are in
multiverse because they (directly or through bd/d) either contain
microcode/firmware or use patented algorithms (at least patented in some
countries).
What these patents (or claimed patents) cover or not is a very good question
for which I could not find an easy and clear answer, at least from this
example for MP3 (see Licensing and patent issues):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP3
If a source in universe can bd on multiverse and have binaries in multiverse
then yes, the easy solution would be to just have mencoder in multiverse.
If not I don't see how to possibly solve this beside:
1) following Debian by disabling mencoder, which doesn't seem to be wished by
seeing posts in this thread and reactions on IRC
2) having two different source packages (which, quite frankly, doesn't seem
feasible from a maintenability pov).
Cesare
More information about the Ubuntu-motu
mailing list