Patch systems in packages
ubuntu at kitterman.com
Wed Aug 27 22:25:02 BST 2008
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 16:47:24 Phillip Susi wrote:
> Emmet Hikory wrote:
> > I am not advocating the storage of patches in the diff.gz, as I
> > believe that this makes the package awkward to extend when Ubuntu
> > seeks to add patches: I'd much prefer that each package have a patch
> > system. I understand that for work in Debian, using a VCS in place of
> > a patch system can be easier, but it's certainly not easier for
> > derivatives, especially for patches that do not belong back in Debian.
> > Rather I am arguing against the introduction of a patch system in
> > Ubuntu for packages that maintain patches in the diff.gz in Debian
> > except in the rare case where there is such a vast separation in the
> > Ubuntu and Debian packaging that it becomes easier to apply Debian
> > patches by reviewing debdiffs between Debian packages rather than
> > either using the merge tools or rebasing packaging off the Debian
> > package each time.
> > 1:
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/intrepid-changes/2008-August/005755.htm
> Sounds like we are in agreement in principal; we just disagree exactly
> where to draw the line. I'd rather get the pain of adding the patch
> system over sooner so it doesn't grow worse when I have to do it later.
> Also if debian is using a VCS then it becomes fairly easy to pull the
> patches from their VCS and merge them into our VCS or patch system,
> rather than trying to do a hand merge between the two .diff.gz files.
Right, but this still leads to the difficult scenario I mentioned yesterday
where the Debian maintainer incorporates the patch, MoM completely fails to
notice it, and then the best thing that can happen is the package fails to
More information about the Ubuntu-motu