sync request sponsorship

[Nicolas Valcarcel]

That sounds pretty fair to me. It was just an idea, but now thinking it
better and reading this arguments i'm convinced it's not a good one :D
Thank you for your time and responses.

On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 14:01 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
> >        Now that we have the uuc team up and running, wouldn't it be a
> > good idea that uuc members can ACK sync requests, since they are
> > supposed to be experienced contributors and should be capable to make
> > sync requests by their own?
> 
>     No.  There is little difference between a manual upload and a
> sync, other than the mechanism by which the changes come to the
> repository, and as such the same criteria for determining whether
> someone can upload to the archive ought be applied.  As there is no
> technical review involved in an application to UUC, there is no
> certain knowledge that any given applicant has the necessary technical
> skills to be trusted with a sync request (or indeed, any sort of
> upload).
> 
>     Rather than change the permission structure of uploads, I'd rather
> encourage those that have the requisite technical skills to apply for
> MOTU: that results in review by both current MOTU and MOTU Council
> review, and is likely to help identify those who ought be able to
> commit to the archive directly.
> 
> -- 
> Emmet HIKORY
> 
-- 
aka nxvl
Peruvian LoCo Team
Key fingerprint = BCE4 27A0 D03E 55DE DA2D  BE06 891D 8DEE 6545 97FE
gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 654597FE

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20080804/7510ab6e/attachment-0001.pgp