SRU's please

[Jordan Mantha]

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Stefan Potyra <
stefan.potyra at informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> now that hardy is out, and intrepid is still closed, it would be a perfect
> time to get going with SRUs for hardy.
>
> Currently, SRU's [1] have the requirement to be fixed in the development
> version first. The main use for this is, to not introduce regressions by
> forgetting to fix the development version. Of course we cannot do this
> right
> now.
>
> So here's my straw-man's plan to get going: Fix stuff in SRU's and drop the
> current requirement to have intrepid fixed first, until intrepid actually
> opens. Tag each upgrade, which gets accepted by the SRU team
> with "needs-fix-intrepid", so that we can later apply the fix for intrepid
> as
> well.
>
> What do you think? More important, motu-sru: is that OK for you?
>

Sound great. +1 from me. One possible question would be if we should go a
bit beyond just opening of Intrepid. Often the archives are generally ready
for large scale work for a few weeks after the archives are open, like after
UDS.

-Jordan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20080425/f4394a90/attachment.htm