<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Stefan Potyra <<a href="mailto:stefan.potyra@informatik.uni-erlangen.de">stefan.potyra@informatik.uni-erlangen.de</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi folks, now that hardy is out, and intrepid is still closed, it would be a perfect time to get going with SRUs for hardy. Currently, SRU's [1] have the requirement to be fixed in the development version first. The main use for this is, to not introduce regressions by forgetting to fix the development version. Of course we cannot do this right now. So here's my straw-man's plan to get going: Fix stuff in SRU's and drop the current requirement to have intrepid fixed first, until intrepid actually opens. Tag each upgrade, which gets accepted by the SRU team with "needs-fix-intrepid", so that we can later apply the fix for intrepid as well. What do you think? More important, motu-sru: is that OK for you? </blockquote></div> Sound great. +1 from me. One possible question would be if we should go a bit beyond just opening of Intrepid. Often the archives are generally ready for large scale work for a few weeks after the archives are open, like after UDS. -Jordan