Order of packages on REVU (was: Re: Frustration)

Stefan Potyra sistpoty at ubuntu.com
Sat Nov 10 23:12:31 GMT 2007


Hi,

Am Sonntag 04 November 2007 16:39:48 schrieb Emmet Hikory:
> Stefan Potyraのメッセージに:
> > Am Sonntag 04 November 2007 15:53:39 schrieb Emmet Hikory:
> > > First:
> > >     Oldest-first list of packages where there is at least one
> > > advocation, and any comments after the advocation are by the uploader.
> > >
> > > Second:
> > >     Oldest-first list of packages where any comments since the last
> > > upload are by the uploader.
> > >
> > > Third:
> > >     Oldest-first list of all remaining packages
>
> <...>
>
> > That would mean that completely new uploads fall in the third catagory
> > and would end up pretty much at the bottom... is this intended?
>
>     My apologies, I should have made it more explicit that by "any" I
> mean "zero or more".  If there is a new upload, it should appear at
> the bottom of the second section.  If the uploader comments, it should
> not adjust the position.  If a reviewer comments, and advocates, it
> should move to the first section.  If a reviewer comments and does not
> advocate, it should move to the third section.

Thanks for pkern finding my silly error, it's done now.

I needed to change the semantics a little bit to produce something usable:
The first sorting criteria is new package/package in archive (to keep these 
separated).

Then follows s.th. not unlike to the following logic[1]:
* The first subordering then is the number of negative advocates, where a 
negative advocation means that a reviewer/admin has commented on and not 
advocated, and is also not the uploader.
* The next subordering is the number of advocations.
* The final subordering is the date of upload.

There may land another update, which splits these "catagories" into separate 
tables, timeline unsure though *g*.

P.S.: did I mention that patches are of course very welcome?

Cheers,
   Stefan.
--
[1]: See <https://code.launchpad.net/~revu-hackers/revu/trunk> for the exact 
details.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20071111/f7564fec/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Ubuntu-motu mailing list