Fwd: Regarding your upload of supertux-0.3.0

[Stefan Potyra]

Hi Rocco,

On Sunday 25 February 2007 05:51:03 Rocco Stanzione wrote:
> Thus spake Stefan Potyra:
> >
> > If noone shouts, I'll upload both tomorrow night, so if you have
> > objections please raise them now.
>
> It's my opinion that we should respect the project's wishes and remove 0.3.
> If that's just too much, can we call the stable version "supertux" and the
> unstable version "supertux-unstable", so that if I apt-get install supertux
> I don't inadvertently get a crashy package that damages the reputation of
> the upstream project?

I've been thinking about this as well, however since we have 0.3 in backports, 
that would mean that everyone who installed the newer version from backports 
will get a downgraded version of supertux once he dist-upgrades to feisty, 
which I guess is not what these people want.

As a side note, the descriptions of supertux has been modified to show that 
it's the unstable development version, also pointing to supertux-stable for a 
stable gaming experience.

Cheers,
   Stefan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20070225/a69a9c72/attachment.pgp