Fwd: Regarding your upload of supertux-0.3.0

[Rocco Stanzione]

Thus spake Stefan Potyra:
> Hi again,
>
> On Saturday 24 February 2007 02:29:27 Sarah Hobbs wrote:
> > Same here, and I suspect that the other users feel the same way.
> > Crashes will not get fixed, even in 0.3.1, as they're now working on the
> > newer series, presumably.
>
> Thanks to Alexandre, we've got the necessary changes for supertux[1] and
> supertux-stable[2] sitting on revu.
> supertux will here remain the unstable 0.3 version, only adding conflicts
> against supertux-stable, while supertux-stable is the stable version from
> debian/unstable, with minimal changes.
>
> I've made sure everything is ok with these packages (though I guess I'll
> test a little bit more ;).
>
> If noone shouts, I'll upload both tomorrow night, so if you have objections
> please raise them now.

It's my opinion that we should respect the project's wishes and remove 0.3.  
If that's just too much, can we call the stable version "supertux" and the 
unstable version "supertux-unstable", so that if I apt-get install supertux I 
don't inadvertently get a crashy package that damages the reputation of the 
upstream project?

Thanks,

Rocco Stanzione