Fwd: Regarding your upload of supertux-0.3.0

[Alexandre Vassalotti]

On 2/23/07, Sarah Hobbs <hobbsee at kubuntu.org> wrote:
> supertux 0.3 is in experimental, and 0.1.3 is in unstable.  This is
> effectively what we're doing (0.3 in feisty, 0.1.3 in edgy).
>
> How can we do what they want?
>

The problem is that SuperTux 0.3 is unsupported, and unlike
experimental, we will eventually need to support Feisty. Therefore, I
think the best thing would to downgrade the package, as requested.
This is sad though; I really liked this version of SuperTux. Any
better idea, than downgrading the package, is fully welcome.

> Also, where have they said that they're not happy?  I've not seen
> reference to this at all.

Sorry, I should've said "concerned" instead.
(http://lists.lethargik.org/pipermail/supertux-devel-lethargik.org/2007-February/000234.html)

-- Alexandre