Fwd: Regarding your upload of supertux-0.3.0

[Stefan Potyra]

Hi,

On Saturday 24 February 2007 01:18:35 Alexandre Vassalotti wrote:
> The problem is that SuperTux 0.3 is unsupported, and unlike
> experimental, we will eventually need to support Feisty. Therefore, I
> think the best thing would to downgrade the package, as requested.
> This is sad though; I really liked this version of SuperTux. Any
> better idea, than downgrading the package, is fully welcome.

Please note, that supertux 0.3.0 is in edgy-backports as well, so we'd end up 
with a strange situation of having a newer version in backports than in 
feisty if we chose to downgrade.

Therefore I'd opt to introduce a supertux-stable based on the version in 
debian/unstable. 

However I must admit that I'm a little bit biased here, since I've been 
playing both the old version and 0.3.0 and really like the new version 
better.

Cheers,
    Stefan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20070224/509ea73e/attachment.pgp