Main inclusion of scim-tables (was Re: UVF exceptions for Universe
- batch 4)
Ming Hua
minghua-list at sbcglobal.net
Thu Feb 23 05:40:13 GMT 2006
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 09:23:21AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:29:45AM +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> > would you please consider the following Upstream Version Freeze
> > exceptions discussed by the MOTUs:
> >
[...]
> > * scim-tables (0.5.5 -> 0.5.6): improved cjk input
> > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/275)
>
> Is scim-tables scheduled for promotion to main with other scim components?
As this has gone unanswered for one week, and the scim-tables UVF
exception is requested by me, even though all I can say is "I don't
know", I figure I'd better say it aloud. :-)
I was approached by HOU "freeflying" Zhengpeng (cc:ed him) early in the
dapper development period about the main inclusion of SCIM related
packages. I was not very interested and told him so, and I was busy
working on getting various SCIM related package into shape at that time.
Then at the end of January we had a talk again about this. I told him
that due to the reluctance of upstream for supporting old releases and
the long lifetime of dapper, I am not really confident to ask SCIM
package for main inclusion at this stage (I am not familar with the
codebase myself, therefore security fixes, if any, is going to be a
problem). But he was very eager to get them into main for CJK support,
so I decided to be impartial on this and told him to go ahead, but just
don't expect my help.
I am therefore not involved in the main inclusion processes of these
SCIM packages, and haven't been contacted about this issue since that
talk (altough I read around and know a little about the progress).
Ming
2006.02.22
More information about the Ubuntu-motu
mailing list