[Ubuntu-l10n-eng] Expanding the scope of the en-GB translation

[Toby Smithe]

On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 21:13 +1000, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> On Sunday 20 August 2006 20:25, William Anderson <neuro at well.com> wrote:
> > Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:
> > > On Saturday 19 August 2006 23:25, Toby Smithe <toby.smithe at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> > >> Also, I noticed that this list doesn't have a Reply-To header which
> > >> points to ubuntu-l10n-eng at lists.ubuntu.com, which is a bit annoying when
> > >> clicking "reply".
> > >
> > > The reason why we don't do this is explained here:
> > >
> > >   http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> >
> > Are we really going to have *this* argument?  What's it like back in 2002?
> > :(
> >
> > Anyway, http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml
> 
> Okay, you win :)
> 
> Until a few months ago, I was a proponent of Reply-To header munging. Some 
> sysadmin friends convinced me otherwise, but nowadays I don't feel too 
> strongly either way. There seems to be some demand for header munging, so I 
> have implemented it. We'll see how it goes.
> 

Cheers, mate. You must admit, it does make life that little bit better
to become comfortable.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-l10n-eng/attachments/20060823/8faaa63d/attachment.pgp