Shell policy approved
Chris Oattes
chris at cjo20.net
Fri Jan 28 20:42:13 UTC 2011
Surely the time to object is during the 2 month period when it existed as a draft on the wiki. Ikonia has been campaigning for this for far longer, and it has been on several IRCC agendas before it was put up for a draft.
Seeker
On 25 Jan 2011, at 10:18, Martin Meredith <mez at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On 23/01/11 18:50, Juha Siltala wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The IRCC met quickly today to approve the shell policy draft. Thanks
>> to all who helped with their input in drafting the document!
>>
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/ShellPolicy .
>>
>> Thanks to all who helped with their input in drafting the document!
> Woah...
>
> I object to this policy. In it's current form, it would allow any op to blanket ban me from Ubuntu Core channels due to the fact that I connect via my own, personal VPS, and I do not have public contact details for that host.
>
> In my opinion, this document needs to state that it is not ok to ban a host purely for not meeting those requirements. It needs to state that those requirements are needed to LIFT a ban, and lack of those requirements will not be used as the sole basis to place a ban (and there should be a documented history of abuse before that is placed)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-irc mailing list
> Ubuntu-irc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-irc
More information about the Ubuntu-irc
mailing list