Shell policy approved

[Corey Quinn]

On Feb 2, 2011, at 5:52 AM, Juha Siltala wrote:
> 
> It really isn't as complicated as this thread makes it look.
> 
> * Troublesome shells will be banned
> * Well run shells will be allowed

I'd argue it becomes even less complicated than that; by the time a shell provider has enough of an abusive pattern established to become ban-worthy, freenode staff generally will have stepped in at the network level.

-- Corey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/attachments/20110202/599c4280/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/attachments/20110202/599c4280/attachment.pgp>