Definition of a "core op"

[Alan Pope]

On 9 October 2010 20:18, Terence Simpson <tsimpson at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Currently all we have is the requirement: "Must already be an
> operator in a core channel", but we need some other requirements.
>

Why do you need some other requirement?

You trust a person not to run amok in core channel, why should they
not be trusted to act the same in any other core channel? Surely
"being a core op" means you've clearly passed some level of expertise
and skill. What possible additional requirements could there be?

I'm genuinely interested to know.

Al.